GPT-4.1 nano vs Ling-flash-2.0

OpenAI · InclusionAI · catalog 2026-09-14

GPT-4.1 nano beats Ling-flash-2.0: cheaper ($0.081 vs $0.183/M) and at least as smart (index 7.8 vs 7.8).
GPT-4.1 nanoLing-flash-2.0
Speed (tok/s)116.7 measured3 measured
Blended $/M$0.081 derived$0.183 derived
Intelligence index7.8 measured7.8 measured
TTFT (ms)81 measured273 measured
Context1048k list—
Coding indexnot measured for both
Agentic indexnot measured for both

GPT-4.1 nano card · Ling-flash-2.0 card · 3D observatory

Verdicts use price×intelligence dominance only, and only where both sides are measured; null cells stay null with their provenance (em-dash = not in catalog). Percentile-free by design — this page compares two models, not the field. Generated page — do not hand-edit.